Electromagnetic Field Mechanisms and Safety Implications in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Contemporary Review

Authors

  • Guan Chengg Wong Department of Electrical Engineering, Politeknik Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah, Persiaran Usahawan, 40150 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3292-2024
  • Siti Sabariah Salihin Department of Electrical Engineering, Politeknik Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah, Persiaran Usahawan, 40150 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3684-223X
  • Rasha Ragheb Atallah Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1433-8964
  • Che Zawiyah Che Hasan Department of Electrical Engineering, Politeknik Ungku Omar, Jalan Raja Musa Mahadi, 31400 Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4631-5457
  • Ibraheem Shayea Electronics and Communications Engineering Department, Faculty of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Istanbul Technical University (ITU), 34467 Istanbul, Turkiye. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0957-4468

Keywords:

Electromagnetic Fields , MRI Principles , MRI Safety, Radiofrequency Fields, Risk Assessment

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) relies on static, gradient, and radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields to generate high-resolution diagnostic images. As MRI technology continues to advance, comprehensive knowledge of these fields is increasingly important for safe and effective clinical practice. However, existing evidence remains fragmented, while limited technical understanding may affect protocol selection, implant assessment, patient handling, and risk management. Therefore, this review aims to explain the principles of MRI electromagnetic fields, examine their effects on image formation, system performance, biological tissue interactions, and implanted medical devices, and synthesise current evidence on their associated safety implications. An integrative narrative review was conducted using structured literature searches, followed by narrative and matrix synthesis of 40 sources including review articles, experimental and simulation studies, clinical investigations, safety guidelines, consensus statements, and organisational studies. The findings indicate that static magnetic fields facilitate nuclear alignment but introduce projectile, vestibular, and implant-displacement hazards. Gradient magnetic fields provide spatial encoding but may induce peripheral nerve stimulation, cardiac magnetostimulation, and acoustic exposure, whereas RF fields enable proton excitation while presenting tissue-heating and implant-related thermal risks. MRI safety is influenced by multiple interacting factors, including scanner configuration, implant characteristics, patient anatomy, operating conditions, staff competency, and institutional governance. Integrating electromagnetic-field principles with evidence-based system design, rigorous safety protocols, and patient-specific risk assessment is essential for ensuring high-quality imaging while minimising patient and occupational risks.

References

L. Mittendorff, A. Young and J. Sim, “A narrative review of current and emerging MRI safety issues: What every MRI technologist (radiographer) needs to know,” J. Med. Radiat. Sci. 69(2), pp. 250–260, Jun. 2022.

M. Tang and T. Yamamoto, “Progress in understanding radiofrequency heating and burn injuries for safer MR imaging,” Magn. Reson. Med. Sci. 22(1), pp. 7–25, 2023.

A. S. Afolabi, “A review of radiofrequency-induced heating challenge caused to medical implants during MRI procedures,” J. Electr. Syst. Inf. Technol. 12, Article 74, Sep. 2025.

T. Okada, T. Akasaka, D. H. D. Thuy and T. Isa, “Safety for human MR scanners at 7T,” Magn. Reson. Med. Sci. 21(4), pp. 531–537, 2021.

B. Moyer, “An overview of medical imaging,” Mouser Electronics, [Online], 2020. Available: https://br.mouser.com/applications/medical-imaging-overview/.

R. Babaloo and E. Atalar, “Minimizing electric fields and increasing peripheral nerve stimulation thresholds using a body gradient array coil,” Magn. Reson. Med. 92(3), pp. 1290–1305, Sep. 2024.

R. Rupp, M. Balk, M. Sievert, V. Leibl, S. Schleder, M. Allner, H. Iro, U. Hoppe, J. Hornung and A. Oreste, “Risk of MRI-induced magnet dislocation for different types of cochlear implants: A single-center retrospective study,” J. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 52, Article 28, Apr. 2023.

F. G. Shellock, M. S. Rosen, A. Webb, W. T. Kimberly, S. Rajan, A. N. Nacev and J. V. Crues, “Managing patients with unlabeled passive implants on MR systems operating below 1.5T,” J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 59(5), pp. 1514–1522, Sep. 2023.

J. Kihlberg, B. Hansson, A. Hall, A. Tisell and P. Lundberg, “Magnetic resonance imaging incidents are severely underreported: A finding in a multicentre interview survey,” Eur. Radiol. 32(1), pp. 477–488, Jan. 2022.

European Society of Radiology (ESR), “The European MR safety landscape,” Insights Imaging 15, Article 238, 2024.

D. Alkhulaifat, L. Vidal, E. Larsen, S. D. Serai, M. S. Ycochea, P. Mecca, L. Orfe and S. Sotardi, “MRI safety—developing the right culture,” Pediatr. Radiol. 55(5), pp. 895–901, May 2025.

S. T. Sotardi, A. J. Degnan, C. A. Liu, P. L. Mecca, S. D. Serai, R. D. Smock, T. Victoria, A. M. White, “Establishing a magnetic resonance safety program,” Pediatr. Radiol. 51(5), pp. 709–715, May 2021.

M. Harwood, S. J. Fahrenholtz, C. V. Wellnitz, A. Kawashima, A. Panda, “MRI in adult patients with active and inactive implanted MR-conditional, MR-nonconditional, and other devices,” Radiographics 44(3), Article e230102, Mar. 2024.

B. Bhusal, J. Stockmann, B. Guerin, A. Mareyam, J. Kirsch, L. L. Wald, M. J. Nolt, J. Rosenow, R. L. Rosado, B. Elahi and L. Golestanirad, “Safety and image quality at 7T MRI for deep brain stimulation systems: Ex vivo study with lead-only and full-systems,” PLoS One 16(9), Article e0257077, 2021.

G. Zandieh, I. Yazdaninia, S. Afyouni, A. Borhani, T. Yokoo and I. R. Kamel, “Updates on the MR safety guidelines – Essentials for radiologists,” Clin. Imaging 118, Article 110394, 2024.

C. Meier, I. Carsten, M. Eisenblätter, A. Hoyer, F. V. Stoye, A. Yilmaz and S. Gielen, “Safety of MRI in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices and abandoned or epicardial leads: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” EP Europace 26(6), Article euae165, Jun. 2024.

L. Shtrepi, V. F. D. Poggetto, C. Durochat, M. Dubois, D. Bendahan, F. Nistri, M. Miniaci, N. M. Pugno and F. Bosia, “Acoustic noise levels and field distribution in 7T MRI scanners,” Front. Phys. 11, Article 1284659, Nov. 2023.

M. Uramatsu, H. Takahashi, P. Barach, Y. Fujisawa, M. Takahashi, S. Mishima and G. Yamanaka, “Improving pediatric MRI safety by enhanced non-technical skills and team collaboration,” Brain Dev. 47(1), Article 104311, Feb. 2025.

D. Kim, J. D. Collins, J. A. White, K. Hanneman, D. C. Lee, A. R. Patel, P. Hu, H. Litt, J. W. Weinsaft, R. Davids, K. Mukai, M. Y. Ng, J. A. Luetkens, A. Roguin, C. E. Rochitte, P. K. Woodard, C. Manisty, K. M. Zareba, L. Mont, F. Bogun, D. B. Ennis, S. Nazarian, G. Webster and J. Stojanovska, “SCMR expert consensus statement for CMR of patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device,” J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 26(1), Article 100995, 2024.

R. J. Russo, L. G. Smith, U. M. B. Green, J. K. Han, A. D. Krah, T. R. Larsen, H. I. Litt, C. F. Liu, S. Nazarian, P. K. Woodard, E. S. Zado and J. N. Koneru, “HRS call-to-action: Improved MRI access for patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices,” Heart Rhythm 22(9), pp. e821–e836, Sep. 2025.

M. J. McJury, “Acoustic noise and magnetic resonance imaging: A narrative/descriptive review,” J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 55(2), pp. 337–346, Feb. 2022.

F. Hadziahmetovic, A. A. Almisreb, C. Z. C. Hasan, and A. Cantelli-Forti, “AI in brain tumour detection: Comparative analysis of YOLOv10 and PaliGemma2 with public perception insights in Bosnia and Herzegovina,” Politeknik & Kolej Komuniti Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 12–24, Nov. 2025.

M. Hori, A. Hagiwara, M. Goto, A. Wada, and S. Aoki, “Low-field magnetic resonance imaging: Its history and renaissance,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 669–679, 2021.

T. C. Arnold, C. W. Freeman, B. Litt, and J. M. Stein, “Low-field MRI: Clinical promise and challenges,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 25–44, 2023.

V. Klein et al., “Simulation of dB/dt-over-electric field cardiac magnetostimulation safety ratios in 75 body models and 18 gradient systems,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 1753–1761, 2026.

M. Davids et al., “Peripheral nerve stimulation informed design of a high-performance asymmetric head gradient coil,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 784–801, 2023.

N. Boulant et al., “Acoustic noise reduction in the NexGen 7 T scanner,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 2261–2270, 2024.

B. Silemek et al., “Rapid safety assessment and mitigation of radiofrequency induced implant heating using small root mean square sensors and the sensor matrix Qs,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 509–527, 2022.

E. Kazemivalipour et al., “Vertical open-bore MRI scanners generate significantly less radiofrequency heating around implanted leads: A study of deep brain stimulation implants in 1.2 T OASIS scanners versus 1.5 T horizontal systems,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 1560–1572, 2021.

B. T. Nguyen et al., “Safety of MRI in patients with retained cardiac leads,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 2464–2480, 2022.

M. J. Greenhill et al., “MRI in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices and fractured or abandoned leads,” Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging, vol. 6, no. 3, Art. no. e230303, 2024.

P. Jacobs and A. J. Fagan, “The effect of frequency (64–498 MHz) on specific absorption rate adjacent to metallic orthopedic screws in MRI: A numerical simulation study,” Medical Physics, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 1074–1082, 2024.

M. Arianpouya, B. Yang, F. Tam, C. E. McElcheran, and S. J. Graham, “Optimized radiofrequency shimming using low-heating B1+-mapping in the presence of deep brain stimulation implants: Proof of concept,” PLOS ONE, vol. 19, no. 12, Art. no. e0316002, 2024.

N. Karadeniz, J. V. Hajnal, and Ö. İpek, “Design of multi-row parallel-transmit coil arrays for enhanced SAR efficiency with deep brain electrodes at 3 T: An electromagnetic simulation study,” Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 107–120, 2025.

N. Kutscha et al., “A deep brain stimulation-conditioned RF coil for 3 T MRI,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 1411–1426, 2025.

B. Bhusal et al., “Comparative study of radiofrequency heating in deep brain stimulation devices during MRI at 1.5 T and 0.55 T: Challenging the assumption of safety at low field strengths,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 785–796, 2025.

M. M. Mustafa et al., “On the RF safety of titanium mesh head implants in 7 T MRI systems: An investigation,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 414–423, 2025.

M. K. Akter, A. Shen, M. Z. Islam, L. Zhang, J. Zheng, and J. Chen, “Numerical and experimental study of RF-induced heating of passive implantable medical devices at 5 T MRI,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 2632–2642, 2025.

C. Hartmann, M. Bouldi, and J. M. Warnking, “Assessing radiofrequency safety of active implants by measuring induced radiofrequency currents using MRI,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 868–880, 2026.

G. Fierens, M. Clemence, N. Verhaert, R. Bowtell, and R. S. Dewey, “The safety of active hearing implants in the ultra-high field magnetic resonance environment: A pilot study,” Otology & Neurotology, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1338–1345, 2025.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2026

How to Cite

[1]
G. C. Wong, S. S. Salihin, R. R. Atallah, C. Z. Che Hasan, and I. Shayea, “Electromagnetic Field Mechanisms and Safety Implications in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Contemporary Review”, PMJET, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 30–44, Jun. 2026.